So, I was debating whether to get into this again.

Long story short, I saw THIS post, which starts off like this:

A story about the famous 18th-century Torah scholar, Rabbi Yonatan Eibeschutz as told by the Lubavitcher Rebbe:

Go read the whole thing for yourself, if you didn’t already. Point is, the whole premise of that story is a lie.

Here’s the first par:

Rabbi Yonatan was well respected by the king of Prague, and often advised him on matters of state.

Jealous of Rabbi Yonatan’s wisdom, members of the court began speaking ill of him to the king. Initially the king refused to believe them, but as time went on, the slander grew and grew until the king was forced to deal with it. An ardent fan of chicken fights, the king suggested a contest to resolve the matter once and for all.

==

There was no ‘King of Prague’ – Prague is a city, not a country.

In typical ‘chassidic Illuminati’ fashion, this story tries to persuade the reader that it’s based on some sort of historical reality, so that the reader takes it more seriously and believes that it’s true, whilst at the same time totally obscuring the real historical reality.

What was the real historical reality?

Bottom line, that Eybshutz was working for the Jesuit royal censors in Prague, to sneakily ‘rewrite the Gemara’ according to the Jesuits’ demands – and to do it in such a subtle way, that no-one would even know what had been removed or rewritten.

Particularly, but not only, concerning the passages re: Oto Ha Ish.

==

Eybshutz’s deceptively-edited Gemara caused such a kerfuffle that the Jewish leaders themselves, including R MOSHE HAGIZ actually asked for it to be banned… at a time when Gemaras were very expensive to print, and very hard to come by.

Hagiz also asked for Eybshutz to be excommunicated at this time, separate to the whole issue with him being a closet Sabbatean who was writing tracts that encouraged readers to start practising incest and pedophilia for ‘kabbalistic reasons’.

==

You can read more about Eybshutz’s ‘censored’ Gemara here:

https://onthemainline.blogspot.com/2011/01/r-jonathan-eybeschutz-censorer-of.html

==

Now, I had some very heavily-researched and historically sourced posts about Eybshutz up on the last blog, which I am finding hard to track down in my folders, for some reason.

Lucky for me, someone archived them on the Wayback machine, or at least, some of them.

Take a look at this:

https://web.archive.org/web/20220220121635/https://www.rivkalevy.com/two-faced/

And this:

https://web.archive.org/web/20220317055915/https://rivkalevy.com/jonathan-eybshutz-the-original-sin/

And I can’t find the one called ‘Bchor Satan’, but that was also an excellent post on who Eybshutz really was.

==

So, the question is, why continue to run ‘interference’ for a known Sabbatean, who we now know DID write Shabbatean ‘black magic’ amulets, DID write tracts encouraging readers to engage in all sorts of terrible immorality in the name of ‘kabbalistic tikkunim’, did work for the royal Jesuit censors, putting out a distorted version of the Talmud that was so bad David Oppenheimer and Moshe Hagiz paid a 10,000 gold coin bribe to get it ‘removed’, DID father the known Sabbatean ‘prophet’ Wolf Eybshutz, and also support him financially when he’d gone totally off the derech and was holding orgies in his lavish mansion decorated with all sorts of avoda zora…?

(These are just the headlines, there is so much more to be said about the pernicious, evil behaviour of Eybshutz.)

==

I’ll let you come to your own conclusions.

But Illuminati propaganda has effectively been working on the same lines for centuries.

I hope more of us start to catch it.

==

PS: This is also a useful post:

https://www.kotzkblog.com/2020/10/298-unimaginable-writings-of-r-yonatan.html

PPS: This is who was ruling over Prague (and many other places) at Eybshutz’s time: