Charlie Kirk: more details
This video makes a lot of sense, about how that ‘weird’ injury was inflicted on Charlie Kirk.
I’m no expert on firearms, so when I saw his shirt jumping like that, and a massive bullet hole on the right side of his body, it made no sense to me, that this could have been a real hit.
I still have no idea what’s really going on, but I found this video, and it makes a lot of sense – and also explains the ‘black dot’ that I also saw on the video I was sent, but didn’t notice.
Long story short: it looks like a bullet came in from the left, hit the top of Kirk’s body armour, causing his shirt to blow up like that, then deflected up vertically into his neck, and then lodged in his brain, killing him instantly.
This is a very possible explanation for why there was no exit wound, no ‘splatter’, and how a bullet that was fired from the left could have hit Kirk in the neck on the right.
==
One of the main ways I try to check out what seems credible, and what doesn’t, it to look at other people’s comments.
The comments under this video seem to back up what the presenter is saying, i.e. people with experience of this stuff in the real world are suggesting they’ve seen very similar things occurring.
As we said, it’s not really the ‘how’ of what happened, or didn’t, it’s what the Evils are planning to do, to try to capitalise on all this to move their own agenda forward.
BH, God will turn everything around for the very best.
==
Rivka, since you know a lot about genealogy and history, and my knowledge of “Abrahamite” history mostly only extends to the sons of Ya`aqov, who are the latter-day Edomites? I know the Jews identify Rome/the Church as Edom, but who in particular has their lineage traceable back to `Esaw (who, along with Ya`aqov, was born in 2006 BCE)? What exactly happened to the originally nomadic people of Edom (who lived by Mount Se`ir), and how does that come down to Rome and the Church?
Whatever research you know about this, I’d like you to share it with me.
This is a good place to start:
https://thinkforyourselfpublishing.com/jewish-sources-on-edom-and-esav/
The Rav also had a stage of talking a lot about the ancestor of Rome a while ago. I’ll see if I wrote that up.
Even the guy who made this video, above, who ‘hates conspiracy theories’ is starting to admit the whole think about the Kirk shooting makes absolutely no sense, logistically.
In the meantime, did you know his wife was a former ‘Miss Arkansas’ beauty queen? I found myself watching her ‘goodbye’ video – and I again got that strange feeling that what we are seeing is not at all what we are really getting.
And just to take this up a whole other level of weird, someone put out a book on Amazon on Sept 9th, a day BEFORE the shooting, called ‘The shooting of Charlie Kirk’ – except, he survived the attempt in that strange book that has now been removed, but which you can still see screenshotted on the wayback machine on Sept 11, here: https://web.archive.org/web/20250911163616/https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0FQMF466K
Something really, really stinks about all this.
As usual.
I looked into this also. Not sure what to say, if anything.
The archive snapshots on archive.is are live over between about 90 minutes and 3 hours 26 minutes, all on 9/11 2025. The author is a made-up name, with no other published work under that name.
Debunking pages say it was AI-generated, seems likely. Unless someone uploads it, no way to know.
So why? To spark discussion and expose people as ‘theorists’.
Likewise, the trajectory of Kirk’s career seems in line with an antinomian accelerationism, where more and more comment bots, set-piece events, and psychological projection are employed to try to make things worse.
The end of his life looks like another ‘archduke in sarajevo’ thing, with a goal to cause people to despair of non-violence.
Of course, the American civil war phenomenon is not worth fighting in.
There would be more effective pushback to mitigate the tendency toward ‘AI’ dystopia without civil unrest.
I hope to see things turn around for good.
We should have a good and better new year.
Thank you.
I watched his follow-up videos.
What is the simplest explanation for the lack of an exit wound? It seems to me that given what was observed, no exit wound means no bullet.
Which drags a whole bunch of other uncomfortable ideas into focus…
Cui bono from all this?
That is the question.
antisemitism is going through the roof – and it’s state sponsored.
In all senses of the word.
Ultimately, it doesn’t matter how or even if he died. The narrative holds sway.
There is now a lot of focus on his evolving views of Israel, and they are getting much more coverage and prominence in death than in life. It all seems very scripted.
I looked at it, and 3 people had commented on that very point: Pre-publishing on the 9th what actually happened on the 10th. The author should be looked into. How did Anastasia J. Casey know?